Building Confidence In Yourself and Your Ideas
One trait that many of the best founders share is conviction. You can be great at programming, sales, and raising funds — but if you don’t truly believe in what you’re building, you’re probably not going to make it.
Transcript
They will take something, you know, anonymous aardvark 42¢ as, like, gospel Yeah. And base their entire life philosophy around it. Yes. Yes. Don't do that. Don't do that.
Alright. Welcome to Dalton plus Michael. And today, we're gonna talk about how fast is too fast for moving a startup. I'll start with a story. I was talking to a YC company. Could have been this batch. Could have been a previous batch. Yeah.
Let's anonymize it. We don't wanna Probably every batch, to be honest. Fair. A common story. And a summary of what they told me was, we got into YC with this idea. We called 25 companies, mostly startups, of course, over the last two weeks. None of them want to buy our product, which doesn't exist. It's just an idea.
And so we decided to pivot. And so can you help us? And People may not know why we think that's funny. Okay. Please explain. This is funny to us.
because that was very low effort. Yes. Trying to contact 25 people and be like, well, I guess They I guess we're done. I guess no one wants it. That's it. So low effort Yes. As to be funny to us. So so carry on with the story.
What was interesting to me about this was that, like, these two founders had a vision in their head. And the second that the path in the startup didn't line up with this vision in their head, which was that, well, I think this idea sounds good. Well, I see fun of this idea, so they were everyone I talked to must think this idea is good. They got a little freaked out.
But then the second thing that I love is that, like, the instinct to talk to startup founders. It was like, I wanna vet this with startup people often because I feel like it's easier to sell them even though this isn't a problem that startups have. The overarching thing was, like, this was not even rigorous thinking. Like No.
Like, where these people used to work, if someone they hired said this to them, they would, like, laugh at them. Yes. They're doing it themselves. Yeah. Why do they do this? The.
version of this that I see a lot is people, the way they start with their company is to cold email a bunch of people on LinkedIn. They're like, Okay, we're doing our startup. We're going full time. Well, so cool. Well, what are you doing? Well, we we we LinkedIn in in mailed. We spammed a thousand people Yes. And we only got three responses.
I guess no one wants this. Yes. And that doesn't work friends. Like that's not sufficient. No. This is very superficial validation Yeah. That people are doing. Right?
Like And so I think people do this because no one told them differently. Actually, here's another way for you on this topic. I think that a lot of people are trained as PMs, they're trained to do user research. Yes. And being trained to do user research I remember taking a user research course in college is you're trained to sort of interview people rather than sell products to them.
And if you can't even interview people, you're not really sure what to do. And so I think my argument is if you've been trained to be a PM or trained to do user interview research, you struggle with getting first customers because the skills that you learned to do this research don't Don't apply. Help. I also think that if you come from a big company,.
either in product or engineering, more often than not, you've never solved your own problem. Like, you're working on other people's problems. And so I think that your instinct when you start a company is like almost a consulting insight. I need to go around. I need to talk to a lot of people.
I'd figure out what their problem is, and I have to solve it, which I think is tricky because it resembles what you did in BigCo, but it probably doesn't represent what the founder of your BigCo did A hundred to start their BigCo. Right? It's like, who did you copy? Like, yourself, employee 10,000? Or what about employee one? Yeah. What did that person do?
So, you know, you talk a little bit about this concept of when people pivot quickly, they they they're not building the muscle of building conviction.
Like, talk to us about that. You know, we have a few different metaphors. I'll mix them. So one of the metaphors is what constitutes a high quality rep? Yes. What constitutes completing a full pivot cycle? Yes. And to learn anything, you need to complete it all the way.
Yes. So again, like being like, we built a product, we spammed 10 people on LinkedIn, none of them replied, let's throw it all in the trash. I am arguing that is not a high quality rep. No. You didn't do anything. You didn't really do anything. You didn't learn anything. It It was sort of just like a waste of everyone's time.
You did you did spend time. So that's fair. You're right. You wasted time. And so Congrats. The the metaphor I sometimes like to tell people when they're pivoting Yeah. Is the most important customer is yourself. And the founder psychology thing you want to do is build conviction in your own mind that this thing is worth working on.
Yes. And so it's not to make investors happy Yes. Or your YC partner happy Yes. Or whatever. It's to convince your brain that more time spent on this idea is time well spent.
Another way I like to think about that is to convince yourself this customer is worth helping. Yeah. Like, you're going to enjoy spending time with this customer. And I find a lot of founders kind of wanna skip that part. Convictionally. Yeah. Oh, I just wanna be in this industry. I just wanna I just wanna them to buy my thing.
I don't want I don't like, don't talk to me. I don't really care about just buy my thing. Make my number go up. And I want to raise my Series A. And so.
in terms of founder personality traits or things you can develop, I think a lot of times how good of a programmer you are is one thing. How good you are at sales, how good you are at fundraising, all these things are important. Yes. But someone that has low conviction and struggles to ever build conviction on anything, even if they're great at all those other factors, not going to make it.
Isn't that crazy? Versus there's people that are worse at some of those other things. Imagine this was like a baseball card of their skills. Not the best programmer, not the best salesperson, not the best fundraiser. But very high conviction and able to focus their energy one direction in a superhuman way, those people tend to succeed. Case in point, Justin Kahn. My cofounder.
I I totally agree. And what's funny is, like, every good startup team has at least one of those people. You need one. Yes. Yes. You need that. And and the too cool for school teams where it's like, oh, no. Like, I can't I can't be too into anything.
Right? Yeah. Like, my bar is super high. It's like, sorry. You'll just you'll pivot till you run out of speed. And and so, like, let's talk about exactly what conviction means. I think it.
doesn't mean believing in things religiously exactly. It's more of not letting yourself get blown off course. So this happens to us a lot. We've seen this at YC. A founder is working on an idea. They think it's going well. They go to fundraise. The fundraise is hard.
What happens if you're not high conviction? Yep. Got to pivot. Got new They give up. So if just meeting with investors causes you to give up on your idea, by definition, I'm arguing you don't have high conviction because you're blown off course. If every time you talk to a new customer, you decide to change your product,.
that is low conviction. You do not have conviction. Let's go back to the investor one. The thing that I hate about that investor one is that if you look at the history of really big companies, so many of them, most investors thought that the idea was horrible. Yes. So it's like empirically, a lot of investors thinking your idea is horrible is not necessarily a bad sign. Correct.
Yeah. It's not necessarily a good sign either, by the No. No. We're not arguing, hey. If it's bad, then it must be good. No. We're not saying that. It's more of a neutral like, it's it's it's it's not a key indicator either way.
Might argue.
But when you take it as the key when it's the only key indicator Yeah. Oh, it's so It's almost like when you spend all your time trying to triangulate.
what other people say is good, and that's how you decide what startup idea to work on Yeah. You're going to have a bad time.
So I think that I've been trying to unpack why do people do this. And more specifically, like, why do people kind of think logically and rationally in their job and then come to their startup and just their quality of thinking decreases by 90%? And you and I talked about this before. You know, a big thing is fear.
In the context of the YC batch, noticed a big thing specifically related to fear is literally like fake information. You know, I had a company told me like, oh man, well we started looking at this problem and realized it was going to take a little while to build. And, you know, we looked at our batch, and 75% of the companies already have launched products that are growing.
And we were like, we can't. And I'm like, wait. Wait. Wait. Pause. I was like, he said it with such conviction for a second. Was like, wow. That's a good job.
Yeah. We're killing. Yeah. 75% already launched. The badge hasn't started yet. And then I was like, wait. Like, why do you, like, why do you think that? And they were like, I just assumed.
I was like, what? You're just making shit up? Yeah. And I was like, you can look. Well, and this is what's funny for the founders that read a lot of Twitter or Reddit or blogs is they will take something, you know, anonymous aardvark forty two said as like gospel and base their entire life philosophy around it. Yes.
Yes. Don't do that. Don't do that. Especially when you can look up the real answer. Like, you can tell which company like, you're in the YC batch, can tell which companies are launched and which ones aren't. The other one was, well, an alum told me I won't be able to raise without, you know, $10,000 in MRR.
And it was interesting because I had to sit down with this founder and say really simply, some companies enter the batch with a post launch product with users. Some companies will enter the batch with an idea. If you were a rational investor, would you judge those two different companies with the same exact rubric? And they're like, of course not. And I was like, okay.
And if an investor did, would you not call them kind of dumb and maybe you wouldn't wanna work with them? I'm like, yeah. So then why are you doing that? Of course, the expectations are different from something that comes into the batch with just an idea. But I think that these kind of false expectations Yeah. Create the fear, and then the fear creates the bad thinking.
And then it's like, once you're in bad thinking, you're kind of fucked. I.
love that technique that you just mentioned. I like to do this one sometimes too when someone is trying to get a first customer, which is like, Okay, in your past job, your team evaluated different software to buy, right? Yes. Yes. And I'd be like, so you have actually been on the other side of the customer conversations a lot. Yeah.
So which of the sales tactics that you're trying would have worked on you? Like, how often do you respond to cold emails on LinkedIn? Yes. Yeah. Oh, never. Okay. With your name kind of poorly replaced in the template. Is that Like And suddenly, their brain, the gears in their brain re engage.
We're like, oh, we evaluated things all the time, and we would do this, and I had these and I'd be like, so basically, you're actually an expert at understanding your customer, because you bought a lot of software on the other side of the table. Yes. What if you just try to come up with tactics that would have worked on you and would have made you buy your product?
And they'll stop and be like, I've never thought of that before. Yeah. And so that's actually a really great technique is to remember back when you've been on the buy side for stuff Yes. And think about what would appealed to you or got you over the line. Exactly. And then that screens out a lot of this junk.
Because the low effort pivots, if you run this thought experiment, they'd like, oh, I would never buy this. I.
think what's so funny is, like, when the founder has that realization, oh, I actually am an expert in this. Like, oh, I can actually lean on expertise. The thing I often say next is like, and that's why we funded you. Look. Yeah. Like, it's like almost like they didn't realize that we funded them because they knew something about the topic they were pitching.
And then when they wanna pivot really quick, we're like, wow. Now you're moving into an area you know nothing about. And we have to like, hey. Remember? Like now you know You know this thing. You're Like, others will respect that too, like your customers. So, no, I think this is it's so tricky because fear really just fucks everything.
But I do think this is one of the reasons why I like the new YC standard deal. Because I think that before, founders would be like, well, if I don't raise indemnity, I'm fucked. And now I can just say to them, it's like, look, imagine a raise in Demba Day. You have half a million dollars. You're fine. Like, there is no gun. The only gun to your head is the one you're lifting.
What keeps you coating over and over again and you never built conviction. Like, when you're low conviction Yeah. Money ain't gonna No. Money's not your problem. So sometimes it's like, hey, founders, just put the gun down. All right. So we often encounter.
these companies, and we've talked about this before, companies that get into pivotitis. Right? They got a bad case. Bad case pivotitis. Right? And I think what's interesting is that, like, a company that will build something, learn over a period of time, and then pivot will often pivot from a place of knowledge and actually continue to make forward progress. But we also see a different version.
How would you describe that version? Yeah. Have you heard the term random walk people? So random walk is where you use a random number generator to decide which direction you go. And basically, when you random walk, you actually never get anywhere.
Like imagine a starting point, and then you walk one direction, and you roll the dice, and you choose a different direction, and you do that over and over again. Yep. You never get anywhere. That's kind of like emailing.
25 startups and asking them if they like your idea. A little bit. It's a little random, right? Do that again. Then do that Yeah. And.
what happens is imagine you're like in a rowboat in the middle of the ocean trying to get back to land. If you just keep changing direction every once in a while, you're never going to get back. You're going be lost at sea. And so you kind of have to get on a vector that even if you have to change a little bit, there's some forward progress you're making in some specific direction.
And I think that what we see that's so unfortunate is that when you do that random walk enough, you just run out of energy. Yep. And I always see it like somewhere in the one and onetwo to two years, if you don't feel like you've learned anything and you've spent two years kind of doing the thing, one, your experience isn't gonna be good. No. Two, you won't feel like you used the time well.
But three, you're just gonna be tired and for no good reason. You're gonna be tired for no good reason.
Well, you've never sunk your teeth in anything. It's like you're you feel like you've been running a race. But the if it's like, so what have you learned? They're like, well, I learned what not to do. Yeah. Like, it's harder kind of hard to articulate why that was a good use of your time. Yes. No.
I think that what's sad is that oftentimes those people have a very bad memory of startups, right? Yeah. And I wish they didn't. Like, the folks who learned and didn't succeed are often motivated to go out and do it again or go work in a company in that space. Like, this is an additive experience in their life, even if their startup didn't work.
The ones who do the random walk, like, they realize, man, this probably wasn't a good use of my time. So anyways, I think that the last point I always like to bring up here is another version of this kind of random walk or email 25 people, then pivot is like launch a product that will help no one Yep. And then pivot.
And in the founder's mind, they'll say, well, I launched an MVP, and nobody wanted it. And we talked about this earlier. It's like, is it an MVP? Yeah, MVP is one of those where.
people say it so much, it's assumed that there's an agreed upon definition. But when you ask for details, I am not convinced there's an agreed upon definition of MVP. So what's your definition of MVP? Well, you know, I.
think that I used to not assume I had to define it narrowly. But now that I think about it, if you can't get anyone to use your MVP,.
it's probably not an MVP. Well, it's not the V. We're missing the V, which is viable. Yeah. Like, basically, if it doesn't work for anyone, Yeah. How it is hard to argue that it's viable. No.
And, like, shouldn't an MV it seems like the cool thing about an MVP is you can do things that don't scale and cheat. Like, you can make it you can kind of will it to work for one person. Right? So the fact that it doesn't work for one person usually means that you weren't even trying to make it work for them. Like, were trying to do something else. This.
is something that comes up a lot when I'm reading applications or in interviews for specifically developer tools. You ready? Yes. Yeah. It'll be like, oh, cool. So I built this tool, and it helps you code, and you're way more efficient, and it's better, and it's we're building our MVP, and we're emailing people on LinkedIn now. What is the question I ask them? Do you use it yourself?
Yes. I will say, great. So tell me about your usage of it. Yeah. And they'll be like, They'll be like, okay. So let get this straight. This is helping programmers and you're outselling it. You're trying to get stone cold strangers to use it, but it's not good enough for you to use yet.
Right? Then Is that what you're saying? Usually, there's like, well, it doesn't have. Like, they can list the thing where it doesn't have this, this, and I mean, like, I would never use it. And so the argument, the earnest point is you should at least be able to use your own tool and be proud to use it or feel like it's providing some value. The V and the V, it's viable for you.
And if you can't even get your you can't bring yourself to use your own product, Yeah. It's a little weird to be trying to sell it to people. More than a little. More than a little weird. And so that should be the bar for a lot of folks Yes. Is that they are willing to use their own product. Yes. Right?
That's a good bar for w especially, I mean, if it's solving your own problem. Then, like, at a minimum Yeah. That doesn't apply. There's some that doesn't apply in some cases. But for a lot of things At a minimum, you should be able to use it. So yes. So once we started looking at it this way, I started realizing, like, how many companies never build an MVP?
Because that that's like it's typically seen as kind of like the first real baby step. Right? And how many folks never get there? They never made one customer happy. And sometimes when I talk to founders who have these big highfalutin plans, like, I bring it back to, like, can we just one? Can we just go one?
You know, the path to 10,000,000 happy users. Yeah. Let's talk about that later for today. How about one? One.
And you can do that. Like, can you can everyone can do that. Yeah. So maybe the long story short here is that, one, it's gonna take maybe longer than you think. So don't have expectations that screw you up. Two, fear makes you think real bad. Like, don't let fear turn a really smart person into a not very smart person.
Three, man, it helps to solve your own problem and then to be your first customer. Yeah. That's a good bar. At least you could say you did that. Yeah. If you're doing a random walk, maybe start with And then four, like, understand that, like, you're gotta do you called it a good rep. Make the analogy because in lifting, like, make the analogy. Yeah.
I think it would just be.
in any kind of exercise or movement, if you wanna build strength, you want to have good form. Yeah. And you won't get better if your form is bad. Or you might even injure yourself, actually. Yes. Right? Yes. Like if you want to learn, I don't know, how to swing a golf club Yep.
And your form is bad, a, you probably won't learn. No. And b, you might injure yourself. Yep. And you're not going to have fun. And you're definitely not going have fun. Yeah. And so you kind of want to have good form Yeah.
When you're trying to do something that's hard. Run a good rep. I like it. All right, man. Great shot. Cool. Thanks, man.
✨ This content is provided for educational purposes. All rights reserved by the original authors. ✨
Related Videos
You might also be interested in these related videos